Thursday 7 January 2016

A new way to make CO2 emission estimates from deforestation more reliable - a step forward for policy implementation?

There are limited studies that exist detailing the emissions arising from a certain land cover changes. So the IPCC shows in their "land-use change" category of SRES category desciptions, that all estimates of emissions from land-use change are calculated based on the obtainable deforestation and afforestation figures. Further, these are based on estimates from the expected carbon storage of a set area of forest. 
In 2012, Harris et al produced a baseline map of carbon emissions in tropical regions, using satellite imagery. Pairing deforested regions of interest with the carbon stock before clearing (using base map) can help with the evaluation of CO2 emissions and the reaching of conservation targets.



The map above is taken from the publication. "Distribution of annual carbon emissions from gross forest cover loss between 2000 and 2005 mapped at a spatial resolution of 18.5 km."

Despite the lowering of deforestation rates (highlighted in my first posts) in South America, it is still high to the extent of emitting 5-200 Gg of Carbon per year between 2000-05. Of course the higher end of this spectrum is only realistic for a few Amazonian regions but should still highlight the importance of tackling this problem. If deforestation effects on the local biodiversity and climate are not enough to power strict management policy implementation, maybe the visualisation of CO2 emissions is!

2 comments:

  1. Hi Loulou, a very interesting blog post accentuating the impacts of deforestation. This is a good representation of CO2 emissions in tropical regions and to what degree deforestation has played a role in influencing the tropical region of South America. I believe that graphs like this help nations visualise their impacts and is a great incentive for management policy implementation, would you not agree?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello Maria - I must agree with you on this! Policy makers are politicians and even environmental ministers are not guaranteed to have experienced a scientific education. Therefore such visualisations and maps serve the wider audience as easily accessible and comprehensible information. This will therefore help to base important political decisions and analyses upon acknowledged scientific knowledge.

    ReplyDelete